The sheets
Nine broadsides, in the order they were made — and two pieces that share the rack without being one. What each is for comes first, because on a broadside that is the load-bearing part.
Everything else here is a web page that will print. These are sheets of paper that happen to have a web page.
These are for printing. They are drawn as black ink on white paper, so a photocopier and a drawing pin are all you need.
What is on this site is only the preview. The sheet is the artifact — made to be handed over, pinned up, or folded into a pocket.
Why paper at all, what earns a sheet, and the one we held back, are below the cards.
Nine broadsides, in the order they were made — and two pieces that share the rack without being one. What each is for comes first, because on a broadside that is the load-bearing part.
The moment: you are giving it to someone you love.
Two-sided single sheet, designed for paper rather than for a screen.
L★S large on the face with Sagan's line and the three pillars; the full Bone Song poem on the reverse. Sized to print uncropped on A4 or US Letter.
Two sides, one sheet, designed for paper rather than for a screen. Side A carries L★S large with Sagan's line from Cosmos (1980) — we are made of star-stuff, and a way for the cosmos to know itself — and the three pillars beneath it: the bone (your skeleton is piezoelectric, and hums a little song, quietly but measurably), the star (the calcium in those bones was forged in a dying star billions of years before you), and the paradigm: difference is variation not deficit, the universe runs on variation, and we call it beautiful, and mean it all the way down to our star stuff — the calling being ours, which is what keeps the panel a claim rather than a proof. Side B is the full Bone Song prose poem. Sized to print uncropped on A4 or US Letter — one physical sheet, two sides, verified by printing it rather than by assuming, with an on-screen toggle between the sides.
The moment: a claim arrives, and it is a little too neat.
A field card for checking a claim.
The hand-out companion to Too Good to Check — six failure modes and their tells on the face; the habits, five of our own published errors, and the refusals on the reverse.
A field card for checking a claim, and the hand-out companion to Too Good to Check. Side A opens on the reason the card exists — a story that fits gets less scrutiny, which is exactly when it needs more — then gives six shapes the failure takes, each with its tell and what to do about it: the quote nobody said (tell: more quotable than anything anyone says out loud; do: search the actual book), the number that went stale (repeated everywhere, dated nowhere), the story told backwards, the credit that drifted, the press release instead of the paper, and the finding that flatters you. Side B holds the habits, five of our own published errors, and the refusals. Sized to print on A4 or US Letter.
The moment: you are opening a room, and this goes on the door.
A sheet for the door.
The hand-out companion to the Inclusion Safety creed: be human, be harmless; no litmus test; one disqualifier, and it is harm.
A creed for the door, and the hand-out companion to the Inclusion Safety creed. Side A states the qualification in full and it is two sentences long: be human, be harmless. Meet both and you are in. Then the numbered points — no litmus test: not your diagnosis, your speech, your output, your history, or how easily others can make sense of you, because there is no audition at this threshold; and worth, not worthiness: worth is a thing you have, entire, already. One disqualifier, and it is harm. Side B is the creed itself. Sized to print uncropped on A4 or US Letter, and meant to go on an actual door.
The moment: someone is about to describe you — or is about to write about us.
Nearly every piece here ends by naming the traps it won't fall into.
Lay them side by side and the same refusals keep returning — so this sheet collects them and counts them, with the measured number of pieces each appears in.
Nearly every piece here ends by naming the traps it won't fall into. Lay them side by side and the same refusals keep returning — and how often each returns is the finding, not the decoration, so this sheet counts them. Side A gives six recurring refusals with the measured number of pieces each appears in. A rhyme, not a proof appears in nine, with the naturalistic fallacy stated as crisply as anywhere on the site: that a pattern recurs in nature is not why difference deserves welcome, since it would deserve welcome in a universe that made exactly one shape — and the pieces it appears in are named underneath it. Side B is what is left standing once the refusals are subtracted. Sized for A4 or US Letter.
The moment: the day you can't do what you did last week.
Capacity is a state, not a trait.
The hand-out companion to Zine No. 20: capacity is a state, not a trait, and the flip from managing to not managing is a cliff rather than a ramp.
For the day you can't do what you did last week — the hand-out companion to Zine No. 20. Side A states the physics and then the claim: cool a glass of water and it does not slowly thicken toward solid; it stays liquid, liquid, liquid, and then at a single temperature flips all at once into ice. Same molecules, nothing added and nothing taken away. Capacity is a state, not a trait. The figure plots two lines against worsening conditions — a dashed diagonal for the gradual decline people expect, and the real curve, which holds and then drops. You are not inconsistent; you were near a boundary. Side B covers supercooling, critical slowing down, threshold anxiety, and what to ask for. Sized for A4 or US Letter.
The moment: someone is asking for a window, and being told they're too sensitive.
For the room where someone can't breathe easy. Don't blame the canary; change the air.
The hand-out companion to Zine No. 24 — one air with no walls in it, shared-air space and co-regulation, and the habitability question.
Don't blame the canary; change the air. One air with no walls in it, shared-air space and co-regulation, and the habitability question on the face. The reverse is the most actionable in the rack — what to build, then what to say and what not to say. It is also the only sheet that stops short on purpose: the Corsi–Rosenthal box is described exactly as its parent describes it and no further, because a build spec that is slightly wrong on paper cannot be corrected once it is on a wall. Compresses Shared Air, Zine No. 24.
The moment: someone says “the real world won't wait,” and expects that to end it.
Hardship now is not preparation.
BGUTI, named by Alfie Kohn in 2005, and why hardship now is not preparation. The hand-out companion to Zine No. 34.
For the meeting where someone says the real world won't wait — the hand-out companion to Zine No. 34. BGUTI, named by Alfie Kohn in 2005, and why hardship now is not preparation: the doctrine has to ignore developmental difference or it stops working, and the claim underneath isn't true either. The reverse keeps the zine's own safeguard — the Greenland shark's 156-year childhood and the bill attached to it come before any application to people — then the social model turn, what to ask instead, and the refusals that stop it becoming a slow-is-beautiful poster. One sheet, two sides, A4 or US Letter.
The moment: you want to hand someone the fact, and let them check it.
The periodic table read as autobiography, and the sheet most likely to end up on a wall.
Eight elements on the face with their house names and their forges — the hand-out companion to Field Guide No. 2.
The periodic table read as autobiography, and the sheet in the rack most likely to end up on a wall — the hand-out companion to Field Guide No. 2. Eight elements on the face with their house names and their forges: hydrogen from the Big Bang, carbon from aging stars, oxygen and calcium from massive stars, iodine from colliding neutron stars. The reverse walks the five forges in order and carries a correction — iron has two parents, roughly half from core-collapse supernovae and half from Type Ia. One sheet, two sides, A4 or US Letter.
The moment: someone at the table is about to say “mild,” “high-functioning,” or “low support needs.”
The sheet you hand across the table when someone is about to say mild.
A functioning-labels field card: the face draws the spiky profile in order to refuse it, and the reverse is where the grid gets dropped.
A functioning-labels field card — the sheet you hand across the table when someone is about to say mild, high-functioning, or low support needs. The face draws the spiky profile, grid and baseline and all, and then five phrases with what each one actually does: high-functioning is heard as a compliment and used as a refusal; low support needs renames the rungs without removing the ladder; mild reports how much your difference costs the person describing it. Drawing the profile in order to refuse it is the point — you cannot refuse a picture you have not shown — and the reverse is where the grid gets dropped. There you get what to say instead, the spectroscopy fact (a spectrum is a fingerprint, not a scale), Helen Edgar's constellation of intensities, and the guardrail the whole sheet stands on: refusing the line is not refusing that some of us need far more support. No rank, and all the care. One sheet, two sides, A4 or US Letter.
Not a broadside — it fails rule four, and is in the rack anyway.
How one phrase compressed itself into a glyph.
Five shorthands — LYDTYSS, LYSS, LUSS, L★S, ★stuff — with their etymologies, and what each compression preserved and let go.
Five compressions, each with its own section and its own argument. The phrase before it became portable. Dropping the scaffolding while keeping the weight — LYDTYSS to LYSS. The single letter that changes and opens the sound up — LYSS to LUSS. The point at which a symbol earns its place, L★S. And the star taking everything else: ★stuff, the noun, reclaimed. Each with its etymology, its register, and an honest account of what the compression preserved and what it let go. Filed in Print because it is a typographic specimen rather than an essay — the subject is what happens to letterforms under pressure, which is why it sits beside the broadsides rather than in a register collection.
Not a broadside either — it fails rule one, and that is the whole idea.
Eighty stars, nothing joined, and a title with a gap in it: My ______ Galaxy.
Field Guide No. 12 ends by asking you to draw your own constellations, and the site gave you nothing to draw on — this is that gap, closed.
Eighty stars, nothing joined, and a title with a gap in it: My ______ Galaxy. Field Guide No. 12 ends by asking you to draw your own constellations, and the site gave you nothing to draw on — this is that gap, closed. Every other sheet in the print rack compresses an argument made at length somewhere else; this one compresses nothing, because it is a surface. The face is the field, with a rule where Helen Edgar's title reads Monotropic, because that is her word for her own experience and a blank sheet must not assume it of whoever picks it up. The reverse is a blank Constellation Index of ten rows — ten rather than twenty, since twenty is her number and printing hers would quietly turn a personal map into a quota. The stars are SVG circles rather than the site's usual CSS starfield, which matters more here than anywhere else on this site: browsers leave background graphics off by default, so a gradient field would have printed as an empty white box, and a blank sheet with no stars on it is not a blank sheet, it is a mistake. Verified by printing it — two sides on A4 and US Letter, with the dots landing on paper. There is no wrong way to fill it in, and no score at the end.
The rest of this collection is light on dark, and the shared stylesheet inverts it for print so that a zine handed to a printer comes back readable. That is a rescue operation, and it works — but it means every other page here was designed for a screen and then made to survive paper.
The broadsides run the other way. Each one is drawn as ink on white in both media, so what you see on this site is not the artifact — it is a preview of the artifact. The sheet is the thing. The web page is how you get one.
That inversion follows from what a broadside is for. A zine is read; a broadside is carried, handed over, and pinned up. It goes into a room where nobody is going to open a laptop — a kitchen table, a clinic waiting area, a staff room, a door. It gets photocopied badly and folded into a pocket. The historical form is the same one, and we are not being clever by borrowing it: a single cheap sheet, posted where people would see it. Proclamations, ballads, manifestos.
Those nine are the whole rack, and it stays small on purpose. Four rules decide what joins it, applied in order — they exist because “this would make a good broadside” is an easy thing to say about almost anything, and most of the time it is wrong. A proposal that fails rule three is not a weaker broadside; it is a zine, and should be built as one.
The fourth rule is the physical one, and every number in it was arrived at by printing something and finding out it was wrong — the paper size, the margin that tipped a sheet onto a third page, the inks, and the three gates that measure it. That working lives on its own page: Designing for Paper →
Not a poster. A poster is finished when you have looked at it. Every sheet here has a reverse, and the reverse is where the sources are.
Not merch. Open edition, CC BY-SA 4.0. No numbered prints, no scarcity, nothing to buy — print as many as you want and give them away. If a sheet works, we would rather it circulate without us.
Not a summary standing in for the argument. A broadside compresses a piece that exists in full, and points at it. It is not the short version for people who won't read the long one.
Not screen-first with a print stylesheet bolted on. That approach is exactly how 44 pages came to print blank. Paper is the target, not the fallback.
Until 15 August 2026 this section read What is not here yet, and the thing it named was the functioning-labels field card — the sheet you hand across the table when someone is about to say “mild,” “high-functioning,” or “low support needs.” It had the clearest moment of anything on the list, which by rule three should have made it the strongest candidate in the rack. It was held anyway, and not for want of an argument to compress.
It was held because Zine No. 21 is after Helen Edgar, and constellation of intensities is her phrase. A broadside circulates harder than a zine — it goes on walls, into meetings, into photocopiers — so who gets to move a phrase into that kind of circulation is a decision to ask about rather than assume.
The sheet now exists, and it exists in the order the hold was for: built first, then shown to Helen as a PDF of the actual artifact rather than described, then shipped on her word. She reviewed it and approved it on 15 August 2026. Describing a sheet is not the same as showing someone the thing that will end up on the wall, which is why the asking came after the building rather than instead of it.
The note stays rather than being quietly deleted, because a hold that vanishes on the day it lifts teaches nobody anything. What it records is that the delay was the correct cost, and that the same question gets asked again next time.